Skip to main content
Sojourners
faith in action for social justice
Sojourners
About
About SojournersEventsOur TeamWork With UsMediaWays to GiveInvite a SpeakerContact Us
SojoAction
OverviewTake ActionIssue AreasResourcesFaith-Rooted AdvocatesChurch Engagement
Magazine
Current IssueArchivesManage My SubscriptionWrite for Sojourners
Sections
LatestPoliticsColumnsLiving FaithArts & CultureGlobalPodcastsVideoPreaching The Word
Subscribe
MagazineRenewPreaching the WordCustomer ServiceNewsletters
Donate
Login / Register

Justices to Take Up Abercrombie & Fitch Headscarf Case

By Richard Wolf
Is Abercrombie & Fitch guilty of religious discrimination? Photo via RNS.
Oct 6, 2014
Share

The Supreme Court granted 11 new cases for review Oct. 2, agreeing to rule on controversial topics such as religious freedom, child abuse, immigration, housing discrimination, congressional redistricting and campaign fund-raising by judicial candidates.

While they delayed any decision on same-sex marriage, the justices filled out their docket through January and into February with civil rights cases and others likely to command attention.

Here’s a look at what the justices chose from among some 2,000 cases that accumulated through the summer:

  •  A religious discrimination lawsuit filed by a Muslim girl who claimed she was not hired as a “model” by Abercrombie & Fitch because of her black headscarf. The Ohio-based company won the case in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, claiming it did not discriminate because the job applicant did not specifically say she needed a religious accommodation. But the Obama administration appealed. At issue is how employers must deal with laws that require them to make allowances for a worker’s religious practices.
  • An Ohio case that will test to what degree a person accused of child abuse must be confronted by the alleged victim in court.
  • A housing discrimination lawsuit filed by civil rights groups in Texas that want tax credits made available for low-income housing in largely white, suburban neighborhoods near Dallas.
  • An immigration case testing whether the U.S. can deny a visa to the husband of a naturalized citizen because he worked for Afghanistan’s Taliban government.
  • A challenge by a Florida judicial candidate to the state Bar Association’s policy against personally soliciting campaign funds.
  • An effort by the Arizona state Legislature to regain the power to draw congressional district lines, now done by an independent commission.

Richard Wolf writes for USA Today. Via RNS.

Got something to say about what you're reading? We value your feedback!

Tell Us What You Think!

We value your feedback on the articles we post. Please fill out the form below, and a member of our online publication team will receive your message. By submitting this form, you consent to your comment being featured in our Letters section. 

Please do not include any non-text characters, such as emojis or other non-standard content, into your submission.  It may cause errors in submitting the form.  Thanks!

Don't Miss a Story!

Sojourners is committed to faith and justice even in polarized times. Will you join us on the journey?
Confirm Your Email Address.
By entering your email we'll send you our newsletter each Thursday. You can unsubscribe anytime.
Is Abercrombie & Fitch guilty of religious discrimination? Photo via RNS.
Search Sojourners

Subscribe

Magazine Newsletters Preaching The Word
Follow on Facebook Follow on Bluesky Follow on Instagram Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Sojourners
Donate Products Editorial Policies Privacy Policy

Media

Advertising Press

Opportunities

Careers Fellowship Program

Contact

Office
408 C St. NE
Washington DC, 20002
Phone 202-328-8842
Fax 202-328-8757
Email sojourners@sojo.net
Unless otherwise noted, all material © Sojourners 2025