Get E-Mail Updates

Cee Lo, Tebow and American Fundamentalisms

Imagine. Image via http://www.wylio.com/credits/Flickr/2512334908
The Strawberry Fields "Imagine" memorial in NYC's Central Park. Image via Wylio http://www.wylio.com/credits/Flickr/2512334908

Cee Lo Green got himself in some pop-culture hot water on New Years Eve when he changed the lyrics to John Lennon's "Imagine." You would think he was changing the Bible or something, but no, it was much worse. He changed the lyrics to a John Lennon song. "No religions" became "all religions" and all hell broke loose.

Huffington Post reported the scandal and the various tweets Green offered in explanation.

The Wall Street Journal carried the story as well. Their website ran this story in "Speakeasy." You can read the comments there for the debate.

Suffice it to say that people were put out. They defended Lennon's unchangeable artistic canon. Green's supporters suggested that all art can be reinterpreted...even John Lennon's. Personally, I didn't find it offensive at all. Instead, I thought it was a thoughtful (if momentary) update to the iconic pop song. Given the religious strife in the world, expressing a love for humanity through all the world's religion was generous and very appropriate for a New Year celebration.

Alas, no. We're beset by fundamentalisms of all kinds (Lennonists?) and on all sides in this nation of ours. We're sufficiently afraid of religiosity that we've turned anti-religiosity into a religion and musicians become gods and their three minute songs become scripture...unchangeable holy writ.

We're afraid and that fear strips us of our compassion.

I have seen something similar in the Tim Tebow phenomena. His "Tebowing" (genuflecting on the football field) is offensive or laughable to many people. I laughed at the SNL skit where Jesus appears in the Broncos locker room. The situation could indeed use a heavy dose of humor, too. People have become more critical and cruel than is helpful.

Tebow does, however, have supporters. ESPN journalist, Roy S. Johnson writes,

"Christianity teaches us to believe and have faith in God, and to trust that He will not only provide for our needs but also bless us in ways our minds cannot fathom.

And He shall give thee the desires of thine heart.

Tebow has essentially embodied these tenets, steadfastly, even in the midst of public scorn and mockery.

Tim Tebow's life story (his confessions, if you will), Through My Eyes was a top seller in 2011 outselling Love Wins by Rob Bell. (Sorry, Rob).

Personally, I don't know enough about Tebow's Christianity to fairly critique it here. I know that some put him in the prosperity Gospel camp. And some sports journalists connect Tebow's faith with his success. Alan Rudnick has written about this:

"...the media has injected so much speculation and unnecessarily inflation of God’s involvement in Tebow’s success. Tebow’s passing statistics for the Steeler’s game was 316 yards. Quickly, the media associated 316 passing yards with John 3:16, one of Tebow’s favorite Bible verses.

It is our culture that has placed God’s favor upon Tebow. Tebow never said, 'I win because I believe in God.' However, those words have been put into the quarterback’s mouth.

Tebow is more than ideology and somehow we have forgotten this. He has established a foundation. Under their "Core Values" is this:

Throughout his collegiate career, Tim was known for the Bible verses he wore on his eye blacks during football games. One of his favorite verses is found in the New Testament in Paul’s letter to the Church in Philippi. In Philippians 4:8-9, the Apostle Paul writes, "whatever things are true, whatever things are noble, whatever things are just, whatever things are pure, whatever things are lovely, whatever things are of good report, if there is any virtue and if there is anything praiseworthy – meditate on these things... and the God of peace will be with you."

He's young and famous and it might be easy for him to get caught up in himself. Fortunately he has a community that will help him stay grounded. Would that we were all so fortunate.

How we speak and write about religion in our country needs a serious once over. Tebow is by no means the first famous football player to express his faith on the field. It happens all the time, I wonder if we've forgotten how to speak publicly about religion with any kindness.

If you look to Troy Palomalu and how his faith (he's a fairly recent convert to Orthodox Christianity) is reported, you might find a helpful start. The Pittsburg Post-Gazette has this great article on Troy's faith. They published:

"[Troy] and Theodora converted to Orthodoxy about five years ago. His background was Catholic and Protestant, hers Muslim and Protestant. They were Christians in search of a deeper, more consistent experience of God.

"Orthodoxy is like an abyss of beauty that's just endless," he said. "I have read the Bible many times. But after fasting, and being baptized Orthodox, it's like reading a whole new Bible. You see the depth behind the words so much more clearly."

"An abyss of beauty..." this phrase will stay with me for a long while. Maybe that's what we should be looking for in all of this debate about public religiosity.

Our fear or disdain is making fundamentalists of us all. The public debate about religion in its various expressions is uncovering competing fundamentalisms in this country.

Lennon, during the Cold War, asked us to see the world as something beautiful, to imagine it so. Green, in his interpretation of Lennon's classic, asks us who are embroiled in global conflict shrouded in religiosity, to see religions as something potentially beautiful.

What if we were to see our variety of faith traditions and expressions as potentially beautiful? Imagine that for a moment.

Then we might know what it is we're really afraid of and speak to that with compassion and fairness.

Imagine.

Tripp Hudgins is a doctoral student in liturgical studies at the Graduate Theological Union in Berkeley, Calif., and associate pastor of First Baptist Church of Palo Alto, Calif. You can read more of his writings on his longtime blog, "Conjectural Navel Gazing; Jesus in Lint Form" at AngloBaptist.org.

 

Sojourners relies on the support of readers like you to sustain our message and ministry.

by: Sam Hamilton

01-10-2012 @ 4:31pm

David Kuo and Patton Dodd wrote an op-ed worth reading in this Sunday's Washington Post about Tebow and Ben Roethlisberger's respective faiths:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/who-is-gods-quarterback-tebow-roe...

I don't care for Lennon's song that much, but the line that particularly irks me is the sentiment about imagining there was nothing to kill or die for.  While I'd love it if there was nothing people would kill other people for, I'd hate to live in a world where there was nothing valuable enough to anyone that they'd give their life of it.  No cause, no other person worth putting ones life on the line for, even theoretically?  No reason to make the ultimate sacrifice?

*************************

Appeal to Sojo:  Don't ban those of us who don't use Facebook or Twitter!  Find another way to clean up the comments section!

 

Tripp Hudgins

by: Tripp Hudgins

01-10-2012 @ 11:11pm
in reply to: Sam Hamilton

John Lennon, if the lyric is any indication, would say that no one should ever have to die for anything...or, more accurately, kill for anything. That's the price he's truly concerned about. There is nothing worth killing for. Nothing. We can romanticize dying for something...but what we're usually doing is dying while trying to kill the enemy. We just lose the fight and die. That said, there's no pure enough motive that is worth dying for, no innocent system that holds a pure virtue...etc.

by: agnosticnomore

01-10-2012 @ 11:19pm
in reply to: Sam Hamilton

I guess the question is whether or not will we kill others because we think our religion is the only true religion, and that somehow God is only available to those of specific beliefs who use theologically prescribed and approved methods of finding Him.

I would hope that when human consciousness has evolved to the point that the Kingdom Of God is established in the hearts of men, that the 'to kill or die for' will have gone into the trash bin of less then profound human ideas.

by: charliek2

01-11-2012 @ 9:26am

Lennon should be understood in his context of the war in Vietnam: lots of dying in the act of killing. No altruistic dying--oh, the monks immolated themselves, but that didn't count. Every art, every work of literature, should be understood in its context. I'm not an apologist for Lennon. I was not a beatle fan. But theirs was a particular context where killing and dying were inextricably linked together.

"Is there nothing worth dying for?" the supporters of the war asked. Certainly! "Is there anything worth killing for?" That's a whole nother question!

by: Sam Hamilton

01-11-2012 @ 11:34am

Tripp, Charlie and Agnostic,

I guess I wasn’t clear enough in my thoughts on “nothing to kill for.” I don’t think there’s any cause pure enough that warrants the killing of others. I totally agree with Lennon on that.

My objection was to the hope for a world where nothing is so dear that you’d give or risk your life for it. Yes, in a perfect world no one would lose their life for anyone else or for any cause because in a world without sin there’d be no evil, no injustice, no sickness, no death, etc.  It would seem a sad world in which to live if nothing was that dear.

I realize Lennon was writing in a specific place and time and perhaps he was writing about specific killing and dying going on in that time rather than that state of the human race in general. I’ll try to be more cognizant of that when I critique his work.

*************************  Appeal to Sojo:  Don't ban those of us who don't use Facebook or Twitter!  Find another way to clean up the comments section!

by: ElrondPA

01-12-2012 @ 4:14pm
in reply to: Sam Hamilton

To say that nothing is worth killing for is to permit those with no such moral compunctions free reign over the world. Killing should not be, except in extremis, a personal decision, but without armed police officers and a military that can protect against foreign invasion, life would be, as Hobbes put it, "nasty, brutish, and short." Much as we might like to imagine a world where all was peace and love, that's not the world we live in, and it won't be until Christ returns. Utopianism is not Christianity.

Do you really think the world would have been better off had the U.S. stayed pacifist in the 1940s? Should Israel have surrendered and accepted annihilation when Egypt & Syria started the Yom Kippur War? More currently, should we have done nothing after 9/11 and just said, "Sorry we offended you, Osama. It doesn't matter if you attack again"?

I would not kill to advance my faith, but to protect against an marauder, you bet. And the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, explicitly recognizes the right, indeed God-given responsibility, of nations to use lethal force to protect their populations.

That's not to say that every war or killing done in the name of our country is justified (though to look again at Vietnam, it's pretty clear that the North Vietnamese and Cambodian Communists were, shall we say, no angels). But pacifism, even if it has a long history in Christianity, is not as morally unquestionable as many of its adherents make out.

by: Jennifer A. Nolan

01-11-2012 @ 8:39pm

Cee-Lo Green was making perfect sense when he changed those lyrics the way he did; religion will never completely disappear until humans turn into something else or those angel trumps blow. What else is Cee-Lo in trouble for, being black??

As for Tebow: no doubt he could use more civil press than he's getting, but I still think non-Christian Americans have as much right to be offended by his public displays as they want; they get enough incivility from some of us. Moreover, his possible belief in a prosperity gospel could also use some clarifying; the prosperity gospel has done enough moral and emotional damage to the needy of this still-Puritanical country as it is, for just about four centuries.

by: psychgirl57

01-12-2012 @ 3:24pm

I bought love wins.

by: aaodyssey

01-13-2012 @ 4:23am

I don't think it matters what people say - if they change the lyrics - it's what they DO that counts.  I've visited Central Park and seen the wonderful memorial, and the bench donated by the people of Liverpool. The Beatles brought joy and good times, and reflectiveness to billions of people - and continue to do so, three generations on.  Would he care that one word of his song was changed?  I don't think so!  By now, he may have become a Christian, or a Buddhist - who knows?

Faith in the US is highly politicised, from my observation. (Travels to the US since '85).   That's sad, because a great deal of the compassion, the reaching out has gone by the wayside.  Your politicians wear faith like a suit of armour.  It's like a tickbox, rather than a way of being and serving the Lord.  I don't know why Mitt Romney is so popular when he runs a company that's prepared to lay-off lots of people in the interests of profit. 

I think,you should be proud what Trebow does on the field.  Wow, way to go, as you say:  someone publicly declaring their faith!  Of course people laugh, or sneer.  Haven't we always, when confronted by anyone who loves Jesus so radically that they wear their faith in work, at home, in the street.  What are we afraid of - that we don't have the guts to do that too?  That we'd rather give up, blend in with the herd, only show up as a Christian when we go to church?

As a Brit/European, we're much quieter in our faith, and it's DEFINITELY OK to talk about it today.  You do it sideways, because you're willing to suspend judgment on someone, not gossip, help out someone who you're not related to, or work with, give some coffee to a beggar.  These things scare and intrigue others, and it's always an invitation to talk about beliefs, then my Christian faith.

I encourage you to try it.  I've been doing it for 10 years now, and no one's ever hit me.  Some people have welled up, and asked me to pray for them, (I do so, and encourage THEM to pray for an end to their suffering too.) Others have talked about their own beliefs, so relieved to be given permission to.  I'm sure people will have laughed behind my back, but so what.  I made them think for a few teeny seconds. 

We're here to plant hope, not scorn.  That's what shows the light of Christ to the world.  

by: JCT3PHD

01-13-2012 @ 11:03am

My comments concern the Tebow fad. I respect his passionate expression of faith, I uphold his right (under the constitution) to make such expressions. What I find personally objectionable is the implication that his winning TD drives are God's will or God's response and reward for his faith. It raises the question, why did God choose to allow his completion of the last pass and not an interception by an equally devout Steeler DB. (Incidentally our local paper carried an article where Tebow's pastor did say that Tim's success on specific plays  is God's reward, God's intervention. Tebow's failure to say otherwise, has to suggest agreement). The issue raises a larger theological issue including intercessory prayer of all kinds, that I have struggled with during 34 years of ministry. But If God intervenes and show favorites in of all things a Professional Football game, I'm not sure I want to be on God's side!

Comments sorted by highest rated. After voting you must refresh your page to see the sort order change.

Tripp Hudgins

by: Tripp Hudgins

01-10-2012 @ 11:11pm
in reply to: Sam Hamilton

John Lennon, if the lyric is any indication, would say that no one should ever have to die for anything...or, more accurately, kill for anything. That's the price he's truly concerned about. There is nothing worth killing for. Nothing. We can romanticize dying for something...but what we're usually doing is dying while trying to kill the enemy. We just lose the fight and die. That said, there's no pure enough motive that is worth dying for, no innocent system that holds a pure virtue...etc.

by: charliek2

01-11-2012 @ 9:26am

Lennon should be understood in his context of the war in Vietnam: lots of dying in the act of killing. No altruistic dying--oh, the monks immolated themselves, but that didn't count. Every art, every work of literature, should be understood in its context. I'm not an apologist for Lennon. I was not a beatle fan. But theirs was a particular context where killing and dying were inextricably linked together.

"Is there nothing worth dying for?" the supporters of the war asked. Certainly! "Is there anything worth killing for?" That's a whole nother question!

by: ElrondPA

01-12-2012 @ 4:14pm
in reply to: Sam Hamilton

To say that nothing is worth killing for is to permit those with no such moral compunctions free reign over the world. Killing should not be, except in extremis, a personal decision, but without armed police officers and a military that can protect against foreign invasion, life would be, as Hobbes put it, "nasty, brutish, and short." Much as we might like to imagine a world where all was peace and love, that's not the world we live in, and it won't be until Christ returns. Utopianism is not Christianity.

Do you really think the world would have been better off had the U.S. stayed pacifist in the 1940s? Should Israel have surrendered and accepted annihilation when Egypt & Syria started the Yom Kippur War? More currently, should we have done nothing after 9/11 and just said, "Sorry we offended you, Osama. It doesn't matter if you attack again"?

I would not kill to advance my faith, but to protect against an marauder, you bet. And the Bible, both Old and New Testaments, explicitly recognizes the right, indeed God-given responsibility, of nations to use lethal force to protect their populations.

That's not to say that every war or killing done in the name of our country is justified (though to look again at Vietnam, it's pretty clear that the North Vietnamese and Cambodian Communists were, shall we say, no angels). But pacifism, even if it has a long history in Christianity, is not as morally unquestionable as many of its adherents make out.

by: Sam Hamilton

01-11-2012 @ 11:34am

Tripp, Charlie and Agnostic,

I guess I wasn’t clear enough in my thoughts on “nothing to kill for.” I don’t think there’s any cause pure enough that warrants the killing of others. I totally agree with Lennon on that.

My objection was to the hope for a world where nothing is so dear that you’d give or risk your life for it. Yes, in a perfect world no one would lose their life for anyone else or for any cause because in a world without sin there’d be no evil, no injustice, no sickness, no death, etc.  It would seem a sad world in which to live if nothing was that dear.

I realize Lennon was writing in a specific place and time and perhaps he was writing about specific killing and dying going on in that time rather than that state of the human race in general. I’ll try to be more cognizant of that when I critique his work.

*************************  Appeal to Sojo:  Don't ban those of us who don't use Facebook or Twitter!  Find another way to clean up the comments section!

by: JCT3PHD

01-13-2012 @ 11:03am

My comments concern the Tebow fad. I respect his passionate expression of faith, I uphold his right (under the constitution) to make such expressions. What I find personally objectionable is the implication that his winning TD drives are God's will or God's response and reward for his faith. It raises the question, why did God choose to allow his completion of the last pass and not an interception by an equally devout Steeler DB. (Incidentally our local paper carried an article where Tebow's pastor did say that Tim's success on specific plays  is God's reward, God's intervention. Tebow's failure to say otherwise, has to suggest agreement). The issue raises a larger theological issue including intercessory prayer of all kinds, that I have struggled with during 34 years of ministry. But If God intervenes and show favorites in of all things a Professional Football game, I'm not sure I want to be on God's side!

by: agnosticnomore

01-10-2012 @ 11:19pm
in reply to: Sam Hamilton

I guess the question is whether or not will we kill others because we think our religion is the only true religion, and that somehow God is only available to those of specific beliefs who use theologically prescribed and approved methods of finding Him.

I would hope that when human consciousness has evolved to the point that the Kingdom Of God is established in the hearts of men, that the 'to kill or die for' will have gone into the trash bin of less then profound human ideas.

by: psychgirl57

01-12-2012 @ 3:24pm

I bought love wins.

by: Sam Hamilton

01-10-2012 @ 4:31pm

David Kuo and Patton Dodd wrote an op-ed worth reading in this Sunday's Washington Post about Tebow and Ben Roethlisberger's respective faiths:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/who-is-gods-quarterback-tebow-roe...

I don't care for Lennon's song that much, but the line that particularly irks me is the sentiment about imagining there was nothing to kill or die for.  While I'd love it if there was nothing people would kill other people for, I'd hate to live in a world where there was nothing valuable enough to anyone that they'd give their life of it.  No cause, no other person worth putting ones life on the line for, even theoretically?  No reason to make the ultimate sacrifice?

*************************

Appeal to Sojo:  Don't ban those of us who don't use Facebook or Twitter!  Find another way to clean up the comments section!

 

by: Jennifer A. Nolan

01-11-2012 @ 8:39pm

Cee-Lo Green was making perfect sense when he changed those lyrics the way he did; religion will never completely disappear until humans turn into something else or those angel trumps blow. What else is Cee-Lo in trouble for, being black??

As for Tebow: no doubt he could use more civil press than he's getting, but I still think non-Christian Americans have as much right to be offended by his public displays as they want; they get enough incivility from some of us. Moreover, his possible belief in a prosperity gospel could also use some clarifying; the prosperity gospel has done enough moral and emotional damage to the needy of this still-Puritanical country as it is, for just about four centuries.

by: aaodyssey

01-13-2012 @ 4:23am

I don't think it matters what people say - if they change the lyrics - it's what they DO that counts.  I've visited Central Park and seen the wonderful memorial, and the bench donated by the people of Liverpool. The Beatles brought joy and good times, and reflectiveness to billions of people - and continue to do so, three generations on.  Would he care that one word of his song was changed?  I don't think so!  By now, he may have become a Christian, or a Buddhist - who knows?

Faith in the US is highly politicised, from my observation. (Travels to the US since '85).   That's sad, because a great deal of the compassion, the reaching out has gone by the wayside.  Your politicians wear faith like a suit of armour.  It's like a tickbox, rather than a way of being and serving the Lord.  I don't know why Mitt Romney is so popular when he runs a company that's prepared to lay-off lots of people in the interests of profit. 

I think,you should be proud what Trebow does on the field.  Wow, way to go, as you say:  someone publicly declaring their faith!  Of course people laugh, or sneer.  Haven't we always, when confronted by anyone who loves Jesus so radically that they wear their faith in work, at home, in the street.  What are we afraid of - that we don't have the guts to do that too?  That we'd rather give up, blend in with the herd, only show up as a Christian when we go to church?

As a Brit/European, we're much quieter in our faith, and it's DEFINITELY OK to talk about it today.  You do it sideways, because you're willing to suspend judgment on someone, not gossip, help out someone who you're not related to, or work with, give some coffee to a beggar.  These things scare and intrigue others, and it's always an invitation to talk about beliefs, then my Christian faith.

I encourage you to try it.  I've been doing it for 10 years now, and no one's ever hit me.  Some people have welled up, and asked me to pray for them, (I do so, and encourage THEM to pray for an end to their suffering too.) Others have talked about their own beliefs, so relieved to be given permission to.  I'm sure people will have laughed behind my back, but so what.  I made them think for a few teeny seconds. 

We're here to plant hope, not scorn.  That's what shows the light of Christ to the world.